Web8 nov. 2024 · NPPF paragraph 148 states that when considering any planning application, LPAs should ensure that substantial weight is given to any harm to the Green Belt. In … WebNo substantial public benefit has been demonstrated or to which I can identify as part of the submitted application, that would outweigh this harm. 10.13 We are required to give the duties imposed by the Principal Act 1990 considerable weight in our planning balance. Paragraph 199 of the NPPF states
High Court Clarifies Levels Of Harm To Designated Heritage Assets ...
Web29 nov. 2016 · The National Planning Policy Framework was published on 27 March 2012 and revised in 2024, 2024 and most recently 20 July 2024. It sets out the government’s … Webdevelopment, the harm to the significance of the CA would be ‘less than substantial’. I attach considerable importance and weight to the desirability of preserving this designated heritage asset. DPD Policy DM38 and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) require that less than substantial harm is balanced against any public benefits. how old was mahmoud in refugee
Considering Heritage Issues in Planning Applications - EM LawShare
Web12 dec. 2024 · 194. Any harm to, or loss of, the significance of a designated heritage asset (from its alteration or destruction, or from development within its setting), should require clear and convincing justification. Substantial … WebPLANNING PRACTICE GUIDANCE (PPG): HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT HISTORIC ENGLAND BRIEFING Context • The Government published an updated Historic … WebFramework (NPPF) updated 2024. The Circular and NPPF confirm that National Parks have the highest status of protection, and the NPPF states at paragraph 176 that great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty in national parks and that the conservation and enhancement of wildlife and cultural merils automotive speedway tucson az 85716